A long time ago, long before I was born, back when the world was black and white and red all over, there was a man who spoke so eloquently, so wisely and so bravely that he righted the course of a nation that had lost its way. His words, spoken from a comfortable chair behind a small wooden desk on which sat little more than a microphone and an ash tray, defanged a rabid wolf and made history. Edward R. Murrow was a patriot without equal; a believer in freedom and democracy; an American hero.
Murrow died before I learned who he was or why he was special. If George Clooney hadn't made a movie about him, most people who weren't alive in the 50s wouldn't have the slightest idea who he was. They don't make men like Murrow anymore.
These days, if you take the time to form an eloquent opinion, you've already lost the argument. It doesn't matter what anyone says anymore; all that matters is that you use the right code words. Liberal, Conservative, Democrat, Republican: if the person speaking has a label that doesn't match your own, you can safely ignore his words. They're probably all lies anyway, right?
Keith Olbermann is one of the few people alive today who both has a voice and is worth listening to. Not because he fits all the right labels or because he yells at people until they give in, but because he's got an amazing talent for turning coherent thoughts into words, putting them on a piece of paper, and then reading them on TV. It's such a simple concept you'd think more people would be doing it, but for some reason it's more precious than gold these days.
The bitch of it is that, in the end, he'll probably just get lost in the noise. TV only had three channels in Murrow's day.
Comments
not entirely unexpected, but...
Sorry Ryan, but he sounds exactly as I expected a MSNBC journalist to sound.
A few questions
What nonsense? Did you disagree with what he was saying, or did you just not like the sound of his voice?
What are MSNBC journalists supposed to sound like? Maybe I'm out of the loop since I don't actually watch any TV that doesn't find its way onto the Intertron.
You say you formed your opinions long ago; does that mean your opinions never change? A lot of things have happened between "long ago" and "now".
What I was trying to say with this post wasn't necessarily that Keith Olbermann has all the right opinions (although I do tend to agree with him on many things); I was trying to say that, regardless of what his opinions actually are, he presents them in an intelligent, reasonable, civilized manner, and that makes him worth listening to.
If certain other news commentators with whom I don't tend to agree were to make their points the way Olbermann makes his, I'd be a lot more willing to listen to what they have to say.
A few responses
I think that the biggest rift in American politics and America itself is that we aren't able to listen to the other side. Nobody says that you have to agree with someone else but you should be able to listen to them.
No title
One thing I do tend to agree with Wonko about is that it's a shame that there are SIDES to begine with. Instead of people forming their own opinions, everything is group-think. All or nothing, republican or democrat, and if you are an independant of any kind you don't have a snowball's chance in hell at getting your guy elected (as president anyway...)
Good Night & Good Luck
Wonko, you might enjoy this movie about another man who spoke well of government abuse of fear politicking in this movie about journalism during Joseph McCarthy's communist witch-hunt. Here's a link for IMDB's page on it: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0433383/
Cheers; -R
Re: Good Night & Good Luck
Um. Yeah. Something tells me you didn't actually read my post. :P