The eclectic musings of a bitter software engineer.

My commute these days isn’t terribly long. It’s only about five miles each way, but it takes me fifteen minutes to drive those five miles thanks to traffic lights, congestion, horribly-timed road construction, and other random variables that pop up from time to time. But what’s slowing me down more than any of these things is one particular motorcycle traffic cop who likes to hide along one particular road that I can’t avoid.

Over the last few years I’ve been making an effort to avoid getting traffic tickets, because when you’re paying $400 a month for auto insurance, there is something horribly wrong. So about two years ago I invested in an Escort Passport 8500, which is widely considered to be the best consumer radar detector money can buy. This handy device has saved me from more tickets than I can count. But there’s still one thing it’s vulnerable to, just like any radar detector, and this thing is instant-on radar.

Luckily, I’ve been being good about not exceeding the speed limit lately, so the only thing that happens when my Passport suddenly emits a frantic explosion of noise is that I jump in surprise and hit my head on the roof of the car. The thing is, every day I know this cop will be there, and every day I look for him, but the only time I see him is when he’s got someone else pulled over. Either he’s found the ultimate hiding place or he’s got some sort of invisibility shield. It’s eerie.

I’m half tempted to speed past this guy some morning, just so I can ask him where the hell he’s hiding. Or perhaps I’ll sneak out early in the morning and wait for him to show up, then follow him.

Or not.

Comments

Information derived from "instant-on" radar bursts is non-evidential. The manufacturer of one of the most popular types of radar guns states in its operation manual that "
citations should not be issued based solely on information derived from the POP burst.”

more info here:
http://www.valentine1.com/pop/
Thursday February 20, 2003 @ 08:45 PM (PST) Posted by scsi-king
I wish I had known this two years ago. I was driving to the beach in my WRX, late at night, and got hit by instant on just after topping a hill. The detector went nuts, but it was too late. I didn't fight the ticket because I'd have had to drive 90 minutes to go to court. I think that one was 89 in a 65. Ick.

It wasn't all a loss though. When the cop walked up to my window and said "Hi there, I'm officer Ballzer, do you know how fast you were going?" I thought I was going to explode. I also thought the two other people in my car were going to explode. Ballzer. Teehehe.
Thursday February 20, 2003 @ 10:05 PM (PST) Posted by Ryan Grove

yea

But legally tickets should never be issued based solely on a radar reading. The officer is supposed to estimate your speed visually before ever measuring it.... like that ever happens.

Thursday February 20, 2003 @ 10:35 PM (PST) Posted by tabor
Post a comment

Basic XHTML (including links) is allowed, just don't try anything fishy. Your comment will be auto-formatted unless you use your own <p> tags for formatting. You're also welcome to use Textile.

Don't type anything here unless you're an evil robot:


And especially don't type anything here:

Copyright © 2002-2008 Ryan Grove. All rights reserved.
Powered by Thoth.